The Dangers of the Emergent and Liturgical Church Movements

The Assimilated Nation


How Postmodern Relativism is Deconstructing Contemporary Evangelicalism and Hijacking the American Church



By Lee Edward Enochs

The Evangelical Debate Society




“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge”

(Hosea 4:6).


“Behold, the days are coming," declares the Lord GOD, "when I will send a famine on the land--not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD”
(Amos 8:11).

“For my people have committed two evils:they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters,and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water”
(Jeremiah 2:13).



In our fast paced, technological and entertainment driven superficial Western culture where stylistic sound- bites and digitally enhanced imagery takes precedent over substance and clearly delineated thought, American Evangelicals often do not have time or conscience desire to soberly and critically analyze the secular and ecclesiastical framework in which we live and move and have our being (Acts 17:28).

Yet, make no mistake about it, there are currently ominously powerful sociological and ideological forces at work throughout Western Civilization that are working overtime to shape both the secular culture and Christian Church along postmodern lines and disseminate a secularist worldview that is bent on eviscerating the validity of the Church and is diametrically opposed to the historic Evangelical Christian faith and societal mission of world evangelization.

While most American Evangelicals are busy being lulled to sleep and unwittingly conformed into submission to secularist and Anti-Christian forces by ever improving technology and round the clock entertainment choices that communicate evil and abominable messages that are entirely antithetical to the teachings and Lordship of Jesus Christ, the devil is actively energizing the postmodern and secularist ideological forces to completely subjugate American civilization and suppress the mission of the Evangelical Church.

Bible believing Christians across America are now indulging themselves with the creature comforts of the world and are being lulled asleep by the call of the abjectly materialistic “American Dream” in pursuit of perpetual comfort and domestic ease through the quest for bigger and better material possessions.

The American Church has largely bought into the insidious lie that the essence of human existence is materialism and image and the most important goal in life is to acquire bigger and better things, be it, houses, cars, boats, vacation homes and a litany of other materialistic and entertainment driven venues.

We are told by secular forces that what matters most in life is to look good, to feel good and to live in optimum comfort for the indulgence of the self. American Evangelicals do not know they have actually bought into the philosophy of narcissism, an excessive preoccupation with self indulgence and one’s own personal importance, or with achieving one’s own chosen goals rather than bonding with others, or with associating only with others whom one chooses.


Like the fictious technological parasites known as the Borg, who incessantly and unquestionably assimilate all life-forms into their ominous robotic collective, made famous in the Star Trek: the Next Generation television series, American Evangelicals are being lulled asleep by postmodern relativism, narcissist and entertainment driven self- indulgence and are being unwittingly culturally assimilated and rendered absolutely irrelevant and ineffective agents of Gospel Change by the seductive sirens of secularism.

Contemporarily, many American Evangelicals have currently rejected the traditional Reformation emphasis on the centrality of the Bible, forensic justification and the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ and his Cross and in turn, have adopted grotesquely unbiblical patterns of belief and worship, as the mass Evangelical rush towards the Emergent and Liturgical Church movements conclusively demonstrate.

The emerging church or emergent church is a diverse movement according to a great article on the free encyclopedia, Wikipedia: within the American Christian Church that arose in the late 20th century as a reaction to the influence of modernism in Western Christianity. The movement is usually called a "conversation" by its proponents to emphasize its diffuse nature with contributions from many people and no explicitly defined leadership or direction. The emerging church seeks to deconstruct and reconstruct Christianity as its mainly Western members live in a postmodern culture. While practices and even core doctrine vary, most emergents can be recognized by the following values:
Missional living - Christians go out into the world to serve God rather than isolate themselves within communities of like-minded individuals.

Narrative theology - Teaching focuses on narrative presentations of faith and the Bible rather than systematic theology or biblical reductionism

Christ-likeness - While not neglecting the study of scripture or the love of the church, Christians focus their lives on the worship and emulation of the person of Jesus Christ

Authenticity - People in the postmodern culture seek real and authentic experiences in preference over scripted or superficial experiences. Emerging churches strive to be relevant to today's culture and daily life, whether it be through worship or service opportunities. The core Christian message is unchanged but emerging churches attempt, as the church has throughout the centuries, to find ways to reach God's people where they are to hear God's message of unconditional love.

Emergent Christians are predominantly found in Western Europe, North America and the South Pacific. Some attend local independent churches that specifically identify themselves as being "emergent", while many others contribute to the conversation from within existing mainline denominations.

The Emergent Church movement has unwisely and unbiblically adopted the existential and ideological cultural hermeneutic of Postmodernism, the relativistic world-view that postulates that there are no ethical and propositional absolutes and seeks to deconstruct and overthrow traditional Western Christian doctrines and morals.

In the Emergent Church movement the doctrines of the Reformation argued for by Martin Luther and John Calvin are unhealthy and unnecessary relics of a semi-modernist and medieval ethos that has been obliterated by postmodernist and postmodern influenced Biblical Scholarship such as the New Perspective and anti-reformation proponents such as New Testament scholars as E.P. Sanders, James Dunn and NT Wright.
We are told by proponents of the Emergent Church movement that traditional Evangelical doctrine divides and that the contemporary Evangelical Christian Church movement within Western Civilization must immediately discard and instantaneously jettison the undue perceived dogmas of the Protestant Reformation and embrace traditionally divergent and diametrically opposed ecclesiastical movements such as Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy under the banner of one big relativistic conglomerate/ synthesis and smorgasbord of “Christian spirituality.”

We are told by the postmodern driven Emergent Church proponents that traditional Evangelical doctrine is divisive and dogmatic and hence must be avoided at all costs, to be replaced by a more tolerant and inclusive “Christian spirituality” that embraces all ecclesiastical traditions that have functioned historically under the umbrella of historic Christendom.

Essentially, the Emergent Church movement leaders and ethos are arguing that the Reformation was unnecessary and the quintessential doctrines of the Protestant Reformation such as the doctrine of the authority of the Bible alone and justification by grace alone through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone is wrong, irrelevant and unnecessarily obstructionist towards the Emerging Church goal of uniting all professing Christians into one united church irrespective of heresy and unbiblical teaching and practices.

The Emergent Church movement is forcefully and openly proclaiming that the traditional doctrinal differences that have historically divided Evangelical Protestants, Roman Catholics and adherents of Eastern Orthodoxy are ill-founded and unnecessary. This is why many Evangelicals are now openly incorporating aspects of Roman Catholic spirituality and teaching into the spiritual disciplines and doctrinal instruction within their respective local churches. Since doctrine no longer matters to most contemporary Evangelicals and historic Reformation teaching is always anathema to many Evangelical Pastors, we are told we should openly embrace the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox teaching and practice into our fellowships.

We are also informed by many Emergent Church leaders that the traditional Evangelical opposition towards female pastors, elders and leadership in the local church are equally archaic and fallacious and that we must openly embrace the overt femmization of Christianity and allow women to lead men in the local Church despite the fact the Bible teaches that women are never to lead men in the context of the local church (1 Timothy 2).

Likewise, many within the Emergent Church movement are calling the Church to embrace homosexuality as viable lifestyle and similarly adopt pluralism, the acceptance of all religions and life-styles as being equally valid as being true.
However, despite this Postmodern and Emergent Church call to discard traditional and conservative Evangelical Doctrine and Practice, I believe this call towards complete assimilation into the postmodern ethos and the embracing of all varieties of spirituality and lifestyle _expression is unwarranted and self-defeating since the Postmodern world-view is so easily demonstrated to be illogical and self-refuting.

Just as relativism can be demonstrated to be false and self-defeating based on the fact that this view in denying there are concrete and real absolutes at once, borrows from the traditional Christian absolutist world-view and deems the traditional Evangelical view to be wrong, all the while proclaiming there are no propositional truths, thus operating in a vicious and self-defeating circle of nonsensical language.

Despite the Postmodernist Emergent Church call to disregard and discard the traditional and conservative Evangelical-Protestant doctrinal positions that clearly divided Evangelicalism from divergent forms of Ecclesiastical spirituality, doctrine, practice and engagement with secular culture, Postmodernity and the Emerging Church is self-defeating and offers the Christian Church in Western Civilization absolutely no concrete reason why we should not abandon Christianity altogether.

In counter distinction to this ill-advised and destructive pathway charted out by many Postmodern and Emerging Evangelicals, there is a better and wiser course of action: embracing the doctrines of the Historic Evangelical Church for these teachings are founded on the authority of infallible Scripture and will never fade away.
Like Martin Luther of the Protestant Reformation, American Evangelicals must stand for the authority of the Bible alone, and the essential teachings of the Christian faith that has made Conservative Evangelicalism what it is, the most powerful force of Biblical change on the face of the Earth.

No, Emerging Church enthusiasts and Postmodernists, American Evangelicals should not abandon the traditions of our Protestant Fathers, to do so would be to go against the clear authority of Holy Scripture and to effect mutiny against Almighty God who sent His Son Jesus Christ to be both Savior and Lord of the earth. Evangelical Church, here we stand before Almighty God, we can no other!


“Thus says the LORD: “ Stand in the ways and see, And ask for the old paths, where the good way is, And walk in it; Then you will find rest for your souls. But they said, ‘We will not walk in it.’
Jeremiah 6:16

On the Reality of Circles and Squares

(Thoughts about God on a Rainy Day)

by Lee Edward Enochs"

The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge" (Psalm 19:1-2).

On a particular dreadful and rainy day my thoughts were about God and I wondered...Why is a circle a circle and a square a square?

Why is an apple not an orange or a banana a pear?

Why does gravity pull an apple down and not up?

Why does a dog drink from a bowl and not a cup?

Why do fish swim upward and not backward in a lake?

Why is Martha in prison and not on TV baking a cake?

Is it because her entire media empire is a fake?

Do we know the shape of objects from the womb?

Or do we learn their identity from observing a room?

Why do poor kids in the hood steal cars and get shot?

While equally bad rich kids in the suburbs do not?

Is reality inherent or through experience observed?

This is what has my mind particularly perturbed...Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Kant, Hume and Hegelphilosophers have all tried to solve this puzzle,

Are things a priori knowable without appeal to particular experience?

Like Descartes, do we "think therefore I am?" or like Popeye the Sailor Man, is it "I am that I am?"
Or are things a posteriori comprehended throughexperience in the process of reasoning from facts orparticulars to general principles or from effects to causes; inductive; empirical?

John Locke(1632-1704) , the British Philosopher said that the mind is "tabula rasa" or a "blank slate", before it receives the impressions gained from experience. In his "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding" (1690), the culmination of twenty years of reflection on the origins of human knowledge. According to Locke, what we know is always properly understood as the relation between ideas, and he devoted much of the Essay to an extended argument that all of our ideas—simple or complex—are ultimately derived from experience.

However, in counter distinction to Locke the German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), argued that there are some things known epistemologically through a priori knowledge or experience.In the realm of Christian apologetics there are some apologists such as Aquinas, Tenant, Butler and Montgomery, that borrow from the thought of Locke and say that Christianity is "known to be true" by individuals by sense experience and probability.

They say that the historical and philosophical evidence for the existence of God and the veracity of the Christian faith is probably true based on the empirical evidence.on the other hand there are "revelational" apologists in Church history like Calvin, Van Til and Bahnsen that argue that the Bible teaches in Romans 1:18-32 that all people inherently know God in their hearts and minds through conscience and creation, but they suppress the truth of God's existence due to the depravity of their sin.

This inherent knowledge of God is deemed the "sensus divinitatis" or divine sense.

However, there are some apologists of the Christian faith that argue that Christianity is known to be true exclusively on the basis of subjective experience and that empirical evidence is unnecessary in determining whether or not Christianity is true.So which is it? Do we know that Christianity is true based on empirical evidence, "sensus divinitatis", or subjective experience?I tend to believe in the "sensus divinitatis" view, but then again, I could be wrong.

I can see where it is possible that all three views, can be simultaneously true at once and that we know that Christianity is true through a variety of means, through the historical evidence such as the resurrection of Jesus Christ and His fulfilled prophecies (1 Corinthians 15:1-11), the knowledge of God that is within us all (Psalm 19, Romans 1:18-32 and Romans 2).I also believe that Christianity is known to be true through the inward witness of the Holy Spirit (John 14:26, 15:26, 16:13, Romans 8:9, Galatians 4:6, 1 John 5:10).The reason why I have included poetic discussion regarding the shapes of apples and things is that I believe that without the existence of the God of Christianity as the precondition of all rational thought, reality itself would be rendered nonsensical.

Why then is a circle a circle and a square a square?And why is an apple not an orange or a banana a pear?I believe it is because God made them that way...

"The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." (Psalm 14:1)

“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God.” (John 3:16-21)